Data Accuracy Benchmarks: SICCODE vs Generic Providers
Verified SIC and NAICS classifications are foundational for analytics, AI modeling, market intelligence, and regulatory compliance. This page presents the evidence behind SICCODE.com’s superior accuracy, stability, and auditability—showing exactly how verified classification outperforms generic, unverified data sources.
Why Accuracy Matters for Analytics, AI & Compliance
Inaccurate industry classification creates downstream errors in market analysis, segmentation, forecasting, AML/KYC modeling, and regulatory reporting. Organizations relying on self-reported or keyword-derived codes often experience noisy cohorts, misaligned peer groups, unstable dashboards, and increased compliance risk.
Verified codes eliminate these issues by providing stable, evidence-backed, regulator-ready industry labels. Learn how verified classification works in Our Verification Methodology.
SICCODE.com vs Generic Providers
- SICCODE.com: Dual-source validation, ML-assisted predictions, human-reviewed assignments, rationale metadata, lineage logs, and version-controlled updates.
- Generic Providers: Self-reported or scraped keywords, inconsistent rollups, limited review, and no visibility into how or when a code was assigned.
Data Quality Benchmark Table
| Metric | SICCODE.com | Generic Providers* |
|---|---|---|
| Classification accuracy (validated) | 96.8% | 80–90% (typical, unverified) |
| Cohort stability (12-mo drift) | Low (versioned rollups) | Medium–High (untracked changes) |
| Auditability | Full rationale + change logs | Minimal/none |
| Coverage | 20M+ U.S. establishments | Varies; duplicates and stale data common |
| Update cadence | Rolling updates with deltas | Irregular; no delta reporting |
*Generic = typical scraped or directory-based providers without formal verification.
SICCODE.com Benchmarks & Impact
- 250,000+ organizations supported
- 300,000+ analytics and marketing implementations analyzed
- Full U.S. coverage with extended 6-digit depth and adjacency intelligence
Benchmarks reflect validated performance across workflows from 2015–2025. See comparative accuracy analysis at Data Accuracy Benchmarks.
How Our Benchmarking Methodology Works
- Regulatory-driven definitions: Official SIC/NAICS rules encoded as structured eligibility logic. Details at Our Verification Methodology.
- Feature extraction: Text, entity, network, and geospatial features harvested from normalized sources.
- ML + human review: Models propose candidates; senior analysts adjudicate edge cases. Meet the team at About Our Data Team.
- Versioning & auditability: Each assignment contains timestamped rationale, reviewer metadata, and delta logs. Framework explained in Governance Standards.
Common Issues in Generic Databases
- Keyword bias: Marketing content incorrectly mapped to unrelated industries.
- Secondary product confusion: Minor product lines override true primary activity.
- HQ/branch duplication: Duplicate entities inflate counts and distort targeting.
- Unstable rollups: Non-versioned updates break time-series continuity.
Benefits by Use Case
- AI & Analytics: Higher signal quality, cleaner cohorts, stronger model performance.
- Marketing & Segmentation: Precise audience selection and improved campaign lift. Explore use cases in Marketing ROI Improvements .
- Compliance & Risk: Versioned lineage, rationale documentation, and regulator-ready evidence.
What Sets SICCODE Apart
- Verified, dual-source-confirmed SIC/NAICS classifications
- Explainable rationale and versioning for every record
- Stable rollups for longitudinal and cross-entity analysis
- CRM- and BI-ready data architecture with clean, normalized identifiers
Related pages: About Our Business Data · How It Works · Why SICCODE · Data Verification Policy